Speaking of the situation of justice in Italy and 'extremely difficult or easy at the same time, in fact if we just say that does not work and that most of the players accept this as dogma would have said something right without effort, just think that journalists speak of the ongoing reform process of approval talking about, when the stipulated maximum period scandalize every civilized country.
On the contrary, if we wanted to understand the causes would be very difficult. One thing is 'certain cases are not in the form of processes, changing more' time, the rules of the process in recent years, the result is not e'mai changed.
I think the main reason for the disruption It is the scarcity number of judges, in fact, the excessive workload on the individual judges contributes to delays and inefficiencies that increase exponentially, in fact, a judicial system that does not work, can face the knowledge of the processes to be wrong, for the sole purpose of benefiting the clumsiness and bad functioning, contributing, thus, do not just work on making it even piu'vero presupposto.Semplice, banal, but it ' what happens in Italy. Coming
actuality 'is precisely the argument that becomes emblematic of the so-called quick process, frankly I find it a measure extremely civil, ensures a maximum piu'accettabili the process in terms of current, the only problem and that there will be a series of collateral damage, or the requirements of many ongoing trials, in criminal proceedings, in fact, the law more ' favorable to the accused applies retroactively, but that it should be a price to pay in the way of normalization, I see no other solutions.
Another argument often to the fore in the newspapers these days and 'the so called "Lodo Alfano, that is, the suspension of trials for piu'alte offices of state, then parlimo sospensione.quindi of the suspension period will not be' counted for the purposes of prescription, then everyone, including Berlusconi, would be processed to fne the mandato.Personalmente find that we can discuss the needs, 'whether' but not on the constitutionality 'of the measure, in fact there are other cases of suspension of the trial nl Ns.oridnamento, just consider the case of illness, building amnesty installment with oblation and so 'way, francamnte and' hard to think 'cause these cases of suspension should be considered constitutional and others not, frankly I can not find an answer.
Regarding the opportunita'credo that everyone can and should have their opinion about not being in any possible way absolute. Massimiliano
Scaringella
Lawyer at the Court of Rome
0 comments:
Post a Comment